Man oh man there's been a lot of discourse surrounding "Joker: Folie a' Duex", and it's not the positive kind. The sequel to the 2019 phenomenon has become one of the biggest box office failures of the year and unlike it's predecessor which won 3 oscars even among it's controversies pre-release (ex: fears that it might incite real life violence), this film seems to have rubbed everyone the wrong way critics, casuals, fans of the first film, you name it. When I saw the movie last week, I hated it. But as time passed in the days of viewing it, I thought more about what the film entailed I have more nuanced thoughts on it. Oh don't get me wrong I still think this movie is bad but I find it to be one of those fascinatingly bad movies. And thus, this won't be a traditional review from me. For this I'm going to discuss some of the aspects of the film that intrigued me the most and where I think Todd Philipps missed the mark. As such "Joker: Fol
Just a place where I give my two cents various topics.